Shaw v. John Doe #1 et al
| Allen Shaw |
| John Doe #2 and John Doe #1 |
| 9:2020cv00418 |
| April 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| David N Hurd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT filed by Allen Shaw. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Shaw inquiring as to status. (nas, ) |
| Filing 8 Letter dated 4/24/2020 filed by Allen Shaw. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: The Court received a letter (Dkt. No. #6 ) from plaintiff on or about April 21, 2020, "seeking clarification" of the Court's Order dated April 14, 2020 (Dkt. No. #5 ("April Order")), which closed the action in light of plaintiff's failure to submit a completed and signed application to proceed in the action in forma pauperis or the full filing fee for commencing an action in this District. The Court's April Order provided plaintiff explicit instructions for complying with the filing fee requirements if he wished to pursue this action. See April Order at 4. For that reason, plaintiff's request for clarification is DENIED, and the Court will not restate those instructions in this Order. Out of special solicitude to plaintiff's pro se status, however, the Clerk is respectfully directed to serve on plaintiff a courtesy copy of the April Order, as well as a blank IFP application and inmate authorization form. Authorized by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/22/2020. (Copy served via regular mail, along with blank forms)(meb)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Motion requesting clarification of administrative closing order filed by Allen Shaw. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP application (Dkt. No. #2 ) is DENIED as incomplete; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. #4 ) is DENIED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed, unmodified, and signed inmate authorization form; and it is further ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance with this Order, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and a blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/14/2020. (Copy served via regular mail, along with blank forms)(meb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Allen Shaw.(meb) |
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Allen Shaw. (meb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Allen Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against John Doe #1, John Doe #2 filed by Allen Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter and mailing envelope)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
