Hudson v. Kirkey et al
| Michael T. Hudson |
| Correction Officer John Doe 5-7, Sergeant John Doe, Correction Officer John Doe 1-4, Correction Officer C. Kirkey, Doctor John Doe and Nurse Jane Doe |
| 9:2020cv00581 |
| May 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS: Filed by Michael T. Hudson. Effective Date June 29, 2020. Old Address: Mid-State Correctional Facility. New Address: Attica Correctional Facility. {Mailing envelope attached}. (rep) |
| Filing 8 MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE: The # 7 Text Order Reopening Case that was sent to Michael T. Hudson at Mid-State Correctional Facility was returned undeliverable. Envelope marked: "Return to Sender - Refused - Unable to Forward." {A review of DOCCS website indicates that the plaintiff is now housed at Attica Correctional Facility. The #7 Text Order and a Notice of Change of Address form are being sent to the plaintiff at Attica Correctional Facility via regular mail}. (rep) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 17, 2020. (Copy served via regular mail)(rep)
|
| Filing 6 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM: Filed by Michael T. Hudson. (rep) |
| Filing 5 MOTION: for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Michael T. Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope) (rep) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete; and it is further ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action; and it is further ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $400.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed and signed inmate authorization form; and it is further ORDERED that, upon plaintiff's compliance with this Order, the Clerk shall reopen the action and forward it to the Court for review; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and a blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 29, 2020. (Copy served via regular mail on plaintiff along with a blank IFP Application and blank Inmate Authorization Form).(rep)
|
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Michael T. Hudson. (rep) |
| Filing 2 MOTION: for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Michael T. Hudson. (rep) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND: Against Jane Doe, John Doe (Doctor), John Doe(employed by DOCCS at Mohawk), John Doe 1-4, John Doe 5-7, C. Kirkey. Filed by Michael T. Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(rep) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
