Daniels v. Correction Officer #1 John Doe et al
| Kent D. Daniels |
| Correction Officer #1 John Doe, Great Meadow Staff Nurse: Jane Doe, Correction Officer #2 John Doe, Nurse Administrator: #2 Jane Doe, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Greene Transfer Inmate #4 John Doe and Medicial Security Desk Officer John Doe #1 John Doe |
| 9:2020cv00888 |
| August 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for a Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order filed by Kent D. Daniels. (meb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Kent D. Daniels.(meb) |
| Filing 2 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Kent D. Daniels. (meb) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/7/2020 with the correct document) (meb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Correction Officer #1 John Doe, Correction Officer #2 John Doe, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Great Meadow Staff Nurse: Jane Doe, Greene Transfer Inmate #4 John Doe, Medicial Security Desk Officer John Doe #1 John Doe, Nurse Administrator: #2 Jane Doe (Filing fee $400 receipt number ALB011830) filed by Kent D. Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Affidavit, #4 Affidavit of Service, #5 Mailing envelope)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
