Campbell v.Bartlett
| Phillip M. Campbell |
| John Rich and Rickey Bartlett |
| 9:2020cv01375 |
| November 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Phillip M. Campbell dated 12/21/2020 advising that he will be released as of 12/30/2020 and his address will be 618 W. State Street, Ithaca NY 14850. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, ) |
Filing 7
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Local Rule 72.4(e). ORDERED, that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED, that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 12/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 petition)[response due by Rickey Bartlett served on 12/16/2020, answer due 3/16/2021] {served as directed}(nas )
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: Based on petitioner's certified IFP Application, Dkt. No. #4 , he is eligible to proceed with this action without paying the statutory filing fee. His IFP Application is therefore GRANTED. Petitioner will still be required to pay fees that he may incur in the future regarding this action, including but not limited to copying fees ($.50 per page). Authorized by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 12/16/2020. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas )
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 12/14/2020. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Phillip M. Campbell.(nas, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Phillip M. Campbell dated 12/8/2020 advising that he is at Willard Drug Treatment Campus. (nas ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 ifp application){order and ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Phillip M. Campbell. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
