Graham et al v. Lovett
| Hakeem Mauzon, Dwayne Handy, Damon Graham and Nicholas Signore |
| S. Lovett |
| 9:2021cv00255 |
| March 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: Respondent answered the petition on April 21, 2021. Dkt. Nos 8-0. Petitioners may, but is not required to, file a reply on or before May 7, 2021. The reply must not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length, excluding exhibits. Petitioners are advised that the arguments contained in the reply shall be limited to addressing the arguments raised by the respondent. This Court will NOT consider any new grounds for relief or other legal theories asserted by petitioners in their reply(ies) that were not previously asserted by them in their petition. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/22/2021. {text order served via regular mail on petitioners}(nas, )
|
|
Filing 9
Medical Records filed by S. Lovett. (Stack, Emer)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by S. Lovett. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kieffer with exhibits, #2 Declaration of Sorrell with filler exhibits, #3 certificate of service)(Stack, Emer) (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/21/2021) (nas, ).
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting respondent's request for a brief extension of time to file his expedited response. Dkt. No. #6 . Respondent's answer is due on or before April 21, 2021. Additionally, respondent's request to file an oversized memorandum of law is also granted. Id. Respondent's brief shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 4/14/2021. {text order served via regular mail on petitioners}(nas, )
|
|
Filing 6
Letter Motion from Emer Stack for S. Lovett requesting an extension of time submitted to Judge Mae A. DAgostino . (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Stack, Emer)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Emer M. Stack on behalf of S. Lovett (Attachments: #1 certificate of service)(Stack, Emer)
|
|
Filing 4
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York in accordance with the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within 30 days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioners may, but are not required to, file a reply within 15 days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/17/2021. [response due by S. Lovett served on 3/17/2021, answer due 4/19/2021] {served as directed}(nas )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Brenda K. Sannes recused. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 3/15/2021. (Copy served on petitioners via regular mail)(rjb, )
|
|
Filing 2
Letter from Graham enclosing the filing fee. (nas )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR058956 (nas, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Hakeem Mauzon, Damon Graham, Nicholas Signore, Dwayne Handy. (Attachments: #1 cover letter from Graham)(nas )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
