Montes v. Morton
Petitioner: Germaine Montes
Respondent: The People Of The State Of New York, Craig D. Apple, Sr. and Robert Morton, Jr.
Case Number: 9:2021cv00376
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk is respectfully directed to update the caption of the case to reflect the proper respondent, Robert Morton, Jr., Superintendent of Downstate Correctional Facility. ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for the Court to appoint him counsel, Dkt. No. #8 , is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED that the Court shall sua sponte give petitioner another thirty (30) days to comply with the Court's May Order, Dkt. No. #6 . ORDERED that if petitioner does not file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order of the Court, Habeas Rule 4. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/28/2021. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas )
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE by Germaine Montes dated 5/19/2021 advising he is at Downstate Correctional Facility. (nas, )
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Letter Motion from Germaine Montes requesting appointment of counsel. (nas, )
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Germaine Montes Effective Date 5/12/2021 Old Address: Albany County Correctional Facility New Address: Downstate Correctional Facility (nas, )
May 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner's motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. #2 , is stayed pending resolution of the matters outlined in this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that if petitioner does not file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without further order of the Court, Habeas Rule 4.Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 5/12/2021. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 6/14/2021, Case Review Deadline 7/12/2021){order and blank 2254 form served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas, )
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 4/19/2021. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
April 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR059139 (nas, )
April 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that petitioner's IFP Application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 4/8/2021. {order and blank ifp application served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Germaine Montes (nas, )
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for release filed by Germaine Montes. (Attachments: #1 medical records) (nas, )
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Germaine Montes. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montes v. Morton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The People Of The State Of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig D. Apple, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Morton, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Germaine Montes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?