Santiagocruz v. Doe #1 et al
| Jose Santiagocruz |
| John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4 and John Doe #5 |
| 9:2021cv00806 |
| July 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Thomas J McAvoy |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #6 ) is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that Plaintiff must, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full, or (2) submit an IFP Application which has been completed and signed by him and which has been certified by an appropriate official at his facility and provide the Clerk. ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff fails to timely comply with the filing fee requirements set forth in this Decision and Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice without further Order of this Court. ORDERED that upon Plaintiff's compliance with this Decision and Order, the file shall be returned to the Court for further review. ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on Plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff two blank IFP Applications; and shall also send Plaintiff a second copy of this Decision and Order, which Plaintiff may provide to the inmate accounts office at his facility along with his request for certification of his completed and signed IFP Application (and/or certified copies of his inmate account statements). Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on August 12, 2021. {served as directed}(nas)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on July 22, 2021. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing 7
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Jose Santiagocruz. (nas, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jose Santiagocruz.(nas, ) Modified on 8/11/2021 (nas, ).
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on July 16, 2021. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Jose Santiagocruz. (nas, )
|
|
Filing 3
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Jose Santiagocruz. (nas, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jose Santiagocruz (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(nas, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5 filed by Jose Santiagocruz. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
