Ferguson v. Lilley
Petitioner: Edward C. Ferguson, III
Respondent: Lynn J. Lilley
Case Number: 9:2021cv01122
Filed: October 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Mae A D'Agostino
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret A. Cieprisz on behalf of Lynn J. Lilley (Cieprisz, Margaret)
October 29, 2021 Filing 5 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Section XIII, Rule 1.1(d) of the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on October 29, 2021. (Attachments: #1 petition)[response due by Lynn J. Lilley served on 10/29/2021, answer due 1/27/2022]{served as directed}(nas)
October 21, 2021 Filing 4 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on October 21, 2021. {text order and updated copy of docket sheet served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
October 21, 2021 Filing 3 Letter from Ferguson enclosing the filing fee. (nas, )
October 21, 2021 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR059943 (nas )
October 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on October 15, 2021. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
October 15, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Edward C. Ferguson, III. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferguson v. Lilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edward C. Ferguson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lynn J. Lilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?