Bradshaw v. Uhler et al
| Jay Bradshaw |
| Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, Gary Gettmann, Eric Marshall, Matthew Chase, Menard, Petterson and John Doe |
| 9:2022cv00094 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Miroslav Lovric |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
DECISION AND ORDER that plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. #5 ) is DENIED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) because plaintiff has three "strikes" and is not entitled to the "imminent danger" exception as set forth above. This action shall be DISMISSED unless, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Decision and Order, plaintiff either (i) pays the Court's filing fee of four hundred and two dollars ($402.00) in full, or (ii) files an amended complaint demonstrating that he faced an "imminent danger of serious physical injury" from the defendants when he commenced this action. Upon plaintiff's compliance with this Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court shall return the file to this Court for review. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Decision and Order, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment dismissing this action, without prejudice, without further order of this Court. Plaintiff's Preliminary Injunction Motion (Dkt. No. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/22/2022. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail) (sal )
|
|
Set Deadlines : Notice of Compliance Deadline 4/21/2022. Case Review Deadline 5/23/2022. (sal)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/11/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
|
|
Filing 6
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Jay Bradshaw. (meb)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jay Bradshaw. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter and mailing envelope)(meb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. Because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk isdirected to administratively close this action. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. In the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules. Upon plaintiff's compliance herewith, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. In accordance with the Rule 10.1(c)(2) of the Court's Local Rules, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Clerk's Office and all parties or their counsel, in writing, of any change in his address. Plaintiff's failure to do so may result in the dismissal of thisaction. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/3/2022. (Copy served upon plaintiff along with blank IFP and inmate authorization forms via regular mail) (sal )
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER : This Court was assigned this case because it is related to 21-CV-0645 and 21-CV-0776 under Section 12(G)(2) of the Court's General Order 12. An Order will be separately issued administratively closing this case until Plaintiff either pays the Courts filing fee or files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Before then, however, the Court denies without prejudice Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. #2 ) on each of two alternative grounds. First, Plaintiff's motion is unsupported by either a memorandum of law (in violation of Local Rule 7.1[b] #1 of the Local Rules of Practice for this Court) or a clear showing that immediate and irreparable injury will result to Plaintiff before Defendants can be heard in opposition (in violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56[b] #1 ). Second, Plaintiff has not shown a likelihood of either irreparable harm or success on the merits of his claims. Finally, Plaintiff is respectfully cautioned that, should be continue to submit filings that are both procedurally and substantively inadequate, he shall be directed to show cause why he should not be enjoined from making future filings pro se (without an attorney). SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/3/2022. (Copy served upon plaintiff via regular mail) (sal)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction filed by Jay Bradshaw. (meb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Reginald Bishop, Matthew Chase, John Doe, Gary Gettmann, Eric Marshall, Menard, Petterson, Donald Uhler filed by Jay Bradshaw.(meb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
