Rodriguez v. The State of New York
| Marcos Rodriguez and Marcos Rodriquez |
| The State of New York |
| 9:2022cv00181 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Andrew T Baxter |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Marcos Rodriguez. (meb)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcos Rodriguez (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope)(meb)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Change of Address filed by Marcos Rodriguez. Old Address: Eastern NY Correctional Facility. New Address: Greene Correctional Facility. (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope)(meb)
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/25/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcos Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope)(meb)
|
|
Filing 7
Letter requesting a copy of the #6 Order and a blank IFP filed by Marcos Rodriguez. (Mailing envelope included) [The Clerk is sending plaintiff the requested documents via regular mail.] (meb) Modified on 3/17/2022 to correct a typo (meb).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. Plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. Because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. If plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed and signed inmate authorization form. Upon plaintiff's compliance with this Order, the Clerk shall reopen the action and forward it to the Court for review. In accordance with the Rule 10.1(c)(2) of the Court's Local Rules, plaintiff shall promptly notify the Clerk's Office and all parties or their counsel, in writing, of any change in his address. Plaintiff's failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff along with a blank IFP application and a blank inmate authorization form. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/1/2022. (Copy served upon plaintiff, together w/ blank IFP application and inmate authorization form, via regular mail)(sal )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcos Rodriguez.(meb)
|
|
Filing 4
INTERROGATORIES filed by Marcos Rodriguez.(meb)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST for Production of Documents filed by Marcos Rodriguez.(meb)
|
|
Filing 2
Medical Records in support of the #1 Complaint filed by Marcos Rodriguez. (meb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against The State of New York filed by Marcos Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Affirmation, #2 Mailing envelope)(meb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
