Jackson v. Uhler
| Bobby Jackson |
| Donald Uhler |
| 9:2022cv00496 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Brenda K Sannes |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret A. Cieprisz on behalf of Donald Uhler (Cieprisz, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 5
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the amended petition, Dkt. No. #4 , is the operative pleading. ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the amended petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Section XIII, Rule 1.1(d) of the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the amended petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on June 3, 2022. (Attachments: #1 amended petition)[response due by Donald Uhler served on 6/3/2022, answer due 9/1/2022] {served as directed}(nas )
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bobby Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Signature Page to Writ, #2 Exhibit(s) Cover Leter)(Suozzi, Theresa)
|
|
Filing 3
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that petitioner may file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that if petitioner does not file an amended petition within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, the Court shall presume that the four aforementioned claims in the original petition are the bases for habeas relief to which the petitioner believes he is entitled and will review said petition as the operative pleading. ORDERED that upon the filing of any amended petition, the Clerk shall forward the file in this matter to the Court for further review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on May 19, 2022. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 6/21/2022)(nas)
|
|
Filing 2
Letter from Attorney Suozzi enclosing the filing fee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR060848 (nas, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Bobby Jackson. (Attachments: #1 exhibits to memo, #2 exhibits, #3 cover letter)(nas )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Uhler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bobby Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Theresa M. Suozzi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Donald Uhler | |
| Represented By: | Margaret A. Cieprisz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
