Blanchard v. King et al
| Charles Edwin Blanchard |
| Sgt. King, C.O. Feliciano, Adam C. Christon, Lance Forkey, Earl Bell, Jason S. Nephew, Taylor E. Stone, Shawn M. Gonyo, Travis L. Baxter, William J. LeClair, Jr., Steven A. Siskavich, Kevin J. Randal, Zachary R. Reese, Nathan J. Bola, Terry T. James, Theodore C. Zorniak, Donald Smith, Jr., Dennis W. Bradford, Daniel J. Holdridge, Kevin G. Wood, Michael R. McShane, Dean M. Provost, Zacharie L. Trombley, Nicholas R. Darrah, Patrick M. Clancy, John Ormsby and Brian P. Macintyre |
| 9:2022cv00608 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Thomas J McAvoy |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Notification to Superintendent of Filing - Provided Superintendent at Five Points Correctional Facility with notice of instant action and a copy of Plaintiff's #3 Inmate Authorization Form. USDC/NYND Finance Dept notified. (meb) |
Filing 7
DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's in forma pauperis application (Dkt. No. #2 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall provide the superintendent of the prison facility in which plaintiff is currently confined with a copy of plaintiff's inmate authorization form (Dkt. No. #3 ) and notify the official that this action has been filed and that plaintiff is required to pay the entire statutory filing fee $350.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide a copy of plaintiff's inmate authorization form (Dkt. No. #3 ) to the Financial Deputy of the Clerk's Office; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice without further Order of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) unless, within 30 days of the date of this Decision and Order, plaintiff files an amended complaint that corrects the pleading defects discussed herein; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Counsel Motion (Dkt. No. #4 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 7/28/2022. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
| Filing 5 Letter enclosing USM-285s filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard. (Attachments: #1 Mailing envelope)(meb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard.(meb) |
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard. (meb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Travis L. Baxter, Earl Bell, Nathan J. Bola, Dennis W. Bradford, Adam C. Christon, Patrick M. Clancy, Nicholas R. Darrah, Feliciano, Lance Forkey, Shawn M. Gonyo, Daniel J. Holdridge, Terry T. James, King, William J. LeClair, Jr, Brian P. Macintyre, Michael R. McShane, Jason S. Nephew, John Ormsby, Dean M. Provost, Kevin J. Randal, Zachary R. Reese, Steven A. Siskavich, Donald Smith, Jr, Taylor E. Stone, Zacharie L. Trombley, Kevin G. Wood, Theodore C. Zorniak filed by Charles Edwin Blanchard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Cover letter and mailing envelope)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
