Damon v. Smith
| Alvin Damon |
| Brandon Smith |
| 9:2022cv00710 |
| July 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| David N Hurd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that the Clerk respectfully serve a copy of this Decision and Order on petitioner in accordance with the Local Rules; The Clerk respectfully serve copies of this Decision and Order, the Petition (Dkt. No. #1 ), the Court's July Order (Dkt. No. #3 ), and petitioner's affirmation (Dkt. No. #4 ) upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Section XIII, Rule 1.1 of the Local Rules; Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition, and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. (Response due by Brandon Smith served on 8/18/2022, answer due 11/16/2022.) Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 July order, #3 Affirmation)(Served as directed)(meb)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Theresa Suozzi, Esq. for Alvin Damon requesting Reply to Request from Court submitted to Judge Hon. Hurd . (Suozzi, Theresa) Modified on 8/10/2022 to make this a letter and not a motion (meb). |
|
Filing 3
DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that petitioner may file a written affirmation, within fourteen (14) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, clarifying the procedural history and posture of any state court action challenging petitioner's criminal conviction as well as the exhaustion status of the claims in his instant action; The affirmation shall not exceed five (5) pages in length; No answer to the petition will be required from the respondent at this time; Either after petitioner submits his written affirmation or upon the expiration of the fourteen days, the Clerk shall forward the entire file to the court for review (Notice of Compliance Deadline 8/11/2022). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 7/28/2022. (meb) Modified on 7/28/2022 to remove the note that this was sent via regular mail (meb).
|
| Filing 2 Letter enclosing the filing fee filed by attorney Theresa M. Suozzi. (meb) |
| Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number SYR061060. (meb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Alvin Damon. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter and signature pages)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Damon v. Smith | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Alvin Damon | |
| Represented By: | Theresa M. Suozzi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Brandon Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
