Osman v. Jones
| Salad Osman |
| Gerald Jones |
| 9:2022cv01296 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Glenn T Suddaby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to electronically transfer this action to the Clerk of the Western District of New York. The Court hereby waives the fourteen (14) day waiting period provided for in Local Rule 3.7. Signed by U.S. District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on January 3, 2023. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas) |
| Case transferred from New York Northern has been opened in U.S. District Court, Western District of New York as case 6:23-cv-06009, filed 01/03/2023. (nas, ) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Osman enclosing filing fee. Fee returned to facility as fee previously paid. Updated copy of docket sheet provided to Petitioner. (nas, ) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to petitioner's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and petitioner was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Petitioner has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by U.S. District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on December 13, 2022. {text order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas ) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 272SR4M4 (nas ) |
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement. Because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. If petitioner wants to pursue this action, he must so notify the Court WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS of the filing date of this Order and either: (1) pay the court's filing fee of five dollars ($5.00); or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP Application that has been certified by an appropriate prison official at his facility. Upon petitioner's compliance with this order, the Clerk shall reopen this action and forward it to the Court for review. Signed by U.S. District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/6/2022. (Copy served upon petitioner along with a blank IFP Application via regular mail)(sal )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Salad Osman. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Osman v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Salad Osman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Gerald Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
