Jackson v. Shelley et al
Plaintiff: Marcus Jackson
Defendant: Toby Shelley, William Fitzpatrick, Marc A. Rothschild, Wellpath and John Doe
Case Number: 9:2023cv00362
Filed: March 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Miroslav Lovric
Referring Judge: Brenda K Sannes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus Jackson(nas, )
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that plaintiff's Second IFP Application (Dkt. No. #4 ) is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that plaintiff must, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Decision and Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full, or (2) submit an IFP application which has been completed and signed by him and which has been certified by an appropriateofficial at his facility. ORDERED that in the event plaintiff fails to timely comply with the filing fee requirements set forth in this Decision and Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice without further Order of this Court and the Clerk shall close the case. ORDERED that upon plaintiff's compliance with this Decision and Order, the file shall be returned to the Court for further review. ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve plaintiff with a copy of the docket sheet, this Decision and Order, and a blank IFP application. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on April 6, 2023. {order and referenced documents served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines/Hearings: Notice of Compliance Deadline 5/8/2023 Case Review Deadline 6/6/2023 (nas, )
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on April 3, 2023. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Marcus Jackson. (nas )
April 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus Jackson(nas, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 4/3/2023) (nas, ).
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, (1) either (a) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full, or (b) submit a completed and signed IFP application; AND (2) submit a completed and signed inmate authorization form. Signed by Chief Judge Brenda K. Sannes on March 23, 2023. {order and blank forms served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marcus Jackson(nas )
March 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe, William Fitzpatrick, Marc A. Rothschild, Toby Shelley, Wellpath filed by Marcus Jackson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Shelley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toby Shelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Fitzpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marc A. Rothschild
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wellpath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?