Moore v. New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper et al
| Gary H. Moore |
| New York State Sentence and Commitment Paper, New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department Docket #OP2200929 and Judge Murad |
| 9:2023cv01286 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Thomas J McAvoy |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the November 7, 2023 Decision and Order of Judge McAvoy.{judgment served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas)
|
|
Filing 2
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the petition be DISMISSED. ORDERED that if petitioner seeks to file any other subsequent petitions challenging his 1995 Nassau County burglary conviction, petitioner must seek permission from the Second Circuit, 28 U.S.C. 2244(b). ORDERED that because petitioner makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right as 28 U.S.C. 2253 requires, a certificate of appealability will not issue. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on November 7, 2023. {order served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- receipt # 600000023) filed by Gary H. Moore.(nas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
