Vanderhorst v. Titus
Jah-Lah Vanderhorst |
Titus |
9:2023cv01339 |
October 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Lawrence E Kahn |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed in accordance with the #5 Decision and Order dated November 13, 2023 of Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn which ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies and ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall be issued. (Copy served via regular mail) (meb) |
The Clerk is sending the #5 Order and the #6 Judgment to petitioner at his updated address, Attica Correctional Facility. (meb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS filed by Jah-Lah Vanderhorst. Old Address: Orleans Correctional Facility. New Address: Attica Correctional Facility. (Mailing envelope included) (meb) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that the Petition (Dkt. No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice as premature for failure to exhaust available state court remedies; and it is further; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue a certificate of appealability ("COA") because Petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Any further request for a COA must be addressed to the Court of Appeals (Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 11/13/2023. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of New York Western; Case Number 1:23-cv-01066. electronically transferred when case opened |
Filing 3 ORDER transferring the action to the Northern District of New York. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 10/30/23. (SG)This was mailed to: Plaintiff. [Transferred from New York Western on 10/30/2023.] |
Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 100002878 (SG) [Transferred from New York Western on 10/30/2023.] |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jah-Lah Vanderhorst.(SG) [Transferred from New York Western on 10/30/2023.] |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jah-Lah Vanderhorst.(SG) [Transferred from New York Western on 10/30/2023.] |
Pro Se Packet Mailed to Plaintiff which included: Privacy Notice, Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge and Civil Case Timeline. (SG) [Transferred from New York Western on 10/30/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vanderhorst v. Titus | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jah-Lah Vanderhorst | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Titus | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.