Sloley v. NYS DOCCS et al
| Maxmillian Sloley and BX |
| NYS DOCCS, Correction Officer Joyce, P.A. Milov, Dr. Sarra Solomon, Dr. Mikhail Gusman, Dr. Anna Andola, R.N. Kim Faulkner, Superintendent Lynn Lilley, Commissioner Daniel F. Martiscello, III, Deputy Commissioner Anne Marie McGrath, Carol Moores and Commissioner Daniel F. Martuscello, III |
| 9:2023cv01469 |
| November 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Anne M Nardacci |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter checking on the status of this case and enclosing a copy of the complaint filed by Maxmillian Sloley. (Mailing envelope included) [The Clerk is sending a copy of the docket sheet to plaintiff via regular mail.] (meb) |
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM filed by Maxmillian Sloley. (meb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Maxmillian Sloley. (meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anna Andola, Kim Faulkner, Mikhail Gusman, Joyce, Lynn Lilley, Daniel F. Martiscello, III, Anne Marie McGrath, Milov, Carol Moores, NYS DOCCS, Sarra Solomon filed by Maxmillian Sloley. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Exhibits, #3 Mailing envelope)(meb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
