Scott v. Martuscello et al
| Daniel Scott |
| Edward Burnett, Daniel Martuscello, III and Ms. Healy |
| 9:2024cv01032 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Anne M Nardacci |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is DENIED as incomplete. ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $405.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. Signed by U.S. District Judge Anne M. Nardacci on August 29, 2024. {order and blank ifp form served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Daniel Scott.(nas ) |
| Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Daniel Scott. (nas ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Daniel Scott(nas ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward Burnett, Ms. Healy, Daniel Martuscello, III filed by Daniel Scott. (Attachments: #1 in support, #2 envelope)(nas ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
