Jones v. Marshall
Petitioner: Nathaniel Jones
Respondent: Lewis Marshall
Case Number: 1:2008cv05793
Filed: June 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Presiding Judge: Kimba M. Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Having carefully considered Magistrate Judge Gorenstein's well researched Report, the Court finds no error and hereby adopts it in its entirety. In addition, petitioner's motion to amend his petition 11 is denied for the reasons articulated in the Report. The Clerk is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/17/2011) (jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathaniel Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lewis Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?