Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-20601
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jones, III v. Muniz et al
as 9:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Muniz, Dwight Blackshire, Gabrielle Lovelady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Spurlock et al
as 9:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Spurlock, Sarah Horace, Robert L. Tanner, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Back et al
as 9:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
J. Back, J. Burleyson, Christopher A. Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31864
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-20420
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Muniz
as 9:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Defendant:
Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-20045
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nathaniel Jones, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
