In re: Barclays Bank Plc Securities Litigation
| Marshall Freidus |
| Barclays Bank PLC, Barclays PLC, Matthew William Barrett, John Silvester Varley, Naguib Kheraj, Robert Edward Diamond, Jr., Richard Broadbent, Richard Leigh Clifford, Dame Sandra J.N. Dawson, Andrew Likierman, Nigel Rudd, Stephen George Russell, John Michael Sunderland, Barclays Capital Securities Limited, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Goldman, Sachs & Co., KeyBanc Capital Markets, RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., Suntrust Capital Markets, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
| 1:2009cv01989 |
| March 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Essex |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
258
OPINION & ORDER re: 183 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Banc of Amer ica Securities LLC, RBC Dain Rauscher Inc., UBS Securities LLC, Barclays Capital Securities Limited, 175 MOTION to Exclude Expert Opinions and Testimony of Allan W. Kleidon, Ph.D. . filed by Dennis Askelson, 181 MOTION f or Summary Judgment . filed by Christopher Lucas, David G. Booth, Richard Leigh Clifford, John Silvester Varley, Barclays Bank PLC, Richard Broadbent, Robert Edward Diamond, Jr., Nigel Rudd, Gary A. Hoffman, Daniel Cronje, Stephen George Russell, Marcus Agius, Dame Sandra J.N. Dawson, Andrew Likierman, Barclays PLC, John Michael Sunderland, Frederik Seegers, Fulvio Conti. The Court GRANTS Barclays' and Underwriters' motions for summary judgment (ECF 181 and ECF 1 83); and DENIES Plaintiff's motion to exclude expert the opinions of Allan W. Kleidon, Ph.D. (ECF 175). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants, terminate all open motions, and close this action. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/13/2017) (kgo)
|
|
Filing
165
OPINION & ORDER re: 141 MOTION to Certify Class . filed by Dennis Askelson. The Court grants the motion for class certification, appoints Dennis Askelson to represent the class, and appoints Kessler Topaz and Robbins Geller as co-c lass counsel. Along with the issuance of this Opinion & Order, the Court will endorse the proposed order (Dkt. 141, Ex. 1). The parties are directed to appear at a status conference on July 27, 2016 at 11:15 am. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion at Docket 141. (As further set forth in this order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 6/9/2016) (lmb)
|
|
Filing
140
OPINION & ORDER re: 115 MOTION to Add Paul Spindel as a Named Plaintiff. filed by Dennis Askelson, Alfred Fait. Lead Plaintiffs' motion to add Paul Spindel as a named plaintiff is DENIED. Lead Plaintiff Askelson may move for c lass certification in accordance with the procedures as set forth in the Revised Scheduling Order. See Dkt. 126 at 8. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion at Docket 115. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/19/2015) (lmb) Modified on 11/19/2015 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on May 31, 2011) (mov)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
