The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Carroll
| The New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Vacation Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship ,Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters Charity Fund, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Fund, The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor-Management Corporation, Michael J. Forde and District Council for New York City and Vicinity, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America |
| Willis Carroll |
| 1:2009cv03207 |
| April 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| New York |
| William H. Pauley |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion to confirm the Arbitration Award and for attorneys' fees and costs is granted. Plaintiffs are directed to submit a final judgment by August 20, 2010. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 8/12/10) (djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
