Castillo et al v. Time Warner Cable
Juan Castillo and Ratakit Boonnak |
Time Warner Cable |
1:2009cv07644 |
September 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Paul A. Crotty |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 OPINION & ORDER: re: 103 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Juan Castillo Motions terminated. For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is GRANTED as modified. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judg ment awarding counsel for Castillo attorney's fees in the amount of $42,299.06 (more than eight times the recovery) and costs in the amount of $4,240.65. The Clerk's judgment should also reflect the $5,000.00 awarded to Castillo by the jury on May 16, 2012. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/24/2013) (rsh) Modified on 4/24/2013 (rsh). |
Filing 50 ORDER: TWC's Motion for reconsideration dated August 23, 2011 is Denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this motion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on October 24, 2011) (mov) |
Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Filed by Time Warner Cable Of New York City. CONCLUSION: For the reasons stated, TWCs motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket #15. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on August 9, 2011) (mov) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.