Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Reis v. Castillo-Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
William Reis
Defendant:
Juan Castillo Torres, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Juan Castillo-Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
CASTILLO v. URBAN CITY DESIGNS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
JUAN CASTILLO
Defendant:
URBAN CITY DESIGNS, INC. and ANDREW DOMINGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vela v. Dawson County Jail
as 5:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Bobby Vela
Defendant:
Dawson County Jail, Juan Castillo and Virginia Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTILLO v. YUASA BATTERY, INC.
as 5:2022cv03088
Plaintiff:
JUAN CASTILLO
Defendant:
YUASA BATTERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CASTILLO v. YUASA BATTERY, INC.
as 5:2022cv03083
Plaintiff:
JUAN CASTILLO
Defendant:
YUASA BATTERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Martinez v. Sauseda, et al
as 5:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert L Martinez, Jr
Defendant:
Dawson County Sheriff's Office, Johnny Sauseda, Matt Hogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. GMG Logistics, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Juan Castillo Hernandez
Defendant:
GMG Logistics, Inc. and Gleyder Govea Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. GMG Logistics, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00148
Plaintiff:
Juan Castillo Hernandez
Defendant:
GMG Logistics, Inc. and Gleyder Govea Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mestas Valdez, et al. v. Garland
as 21-47
Petitioner:
AURORA MESTAS VALDEZ and JUAN CASTILLO GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
