Bellezza v. Holland et al
| Frank Bellezza |
| D. Holland, L. Clark, S. Katz, R.J. Cunningham and B. Fisher |
| 1:2009cv08434 |
| October 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Chemung |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION & ORDER granting re: 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion filed by D. Holland. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket item 52 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/7/2012) (cd)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by R.J. Cunningham, L. Clark, B. Fisher, S. Katz, D. Holland. Upon the conclusions set forth in this Opinion, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's denial of access to courts claim is granted, and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment claim is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 7/11/2011) (tro)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by R.J. Cunningham, L. Clark, B. Fisher, S. Katz, D. Holland. Upon the conclusions set forth in this Opinion, Defendants' motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed with costs. Plaintiff is granted leave to replead within forty days. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 7/27/2010) (tro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
