Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Hopkins et al v. BMO Bank NA et al
as 2:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
David Hopkins and Patricia Hopkins
Defendant:
BMO Bank NA, Chase Bank NA, Betty D Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holland v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Derrico D. Holland
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Stephanie Hopping, et al v. Lorin Schell, et al
as 23-16072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE HOPPING, DIANNA HOPPING-RAIS, NICOLAS HOPPING and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIN EDWARD SCHELL, LESLIEY D. HOLLAND, ANTHONY MICHAEL DESPOTES and others
JOHNSON v. HOLLAND et al
as 2:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
KOKO JOHNSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW D. HOLLAND and KIM BERKELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Mullins et al
as 7:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Wilson
Defendant:
R. Mullins, D. Holland, C. Bower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Holland
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Steven Sherman v. A Burleson, et al
as 22-11686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A BURLESON, Officer, PULLEY, J D HOLLAND, Officer and others
Bernard Holland v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-1007
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNARD D. HOLLAND
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(PS) Hopping et al v. Schell et al
as 2:2021cv01623
Defendant:
Jesiros Bautista, Lorin Edward Schell, Lesliey D. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hopping, Dianna Hopping-Rais, Nicolas Hopping and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHERMAN v. BURLESON et al
as 3:2021cv00537
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J D HOLLAND, CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
