Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Limited et al v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC et al
| Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Limited, Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 5 Limited, Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 15 Limited, Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 28 Limited and Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 30 Limited |
| Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Harding Advisory LLC, Structured Asset Investors, LLC, Octans II CDO Ltd., Octans II CDO LLC, Sagittarius CDO I Ltd., Longshore CDO Funding 2007-3 Ltd. and Longshore CDO Funding 2007-3 LLC |
| 1:2012cv03723 |
| May 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Other Fraud |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 632 Foreign Banking: Voluntary Liquidation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
442
OPINION & ORDER re: 397 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Structured Asset Investors, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, 394 MOTION to Preclude Proffered Expert Opinions of Dr. Jonathan Neuber ger. filed by Structured Asset Investors, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. For the reasons stated, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion to exclude Plaintiffs' experts, with one limited exception, and GRANTS Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in Defendants' favor, close Dkts. 394 and 397, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 9/17/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing
215
OPINION AND ORDER re: 147 MOTION to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint, filed by IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG: For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that IKB's motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL as a motion for summary judgment following completion of discovery. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 147. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/10/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
180
OPINION & ORDER re: 106 MOTION to Dismiss Corrected filed by Structured Asset Investors, LLC, Longshore CDO Funding 2007-3 LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Harding Advisory LLC. For the re asons discussed above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with respect to Count III, Plaintiffs' claim for conspiracy to commit fraud, and is denied with respect to Count II, Plaintiffs' claim for rescission, and Count IV, Plaintiffs' claim for aiding and abetting fraud. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket nu mber 106. The parties are reminded that the deadline to complete discovery is April 3, 2017, and if either party contemplates filing a post-discovery motion, pre-motion letters are to be submitted by that date. (Doc. No. 152.) As previously ord ered, the Court will hold a post-discovery conference on April 21, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 905 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse located at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. (Id.) (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) ( Status Conference set for 4/21/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 905, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Richard J. Sullivan.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/29/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
