Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.

Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Denimafia Inc.
Defendant:	New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv04112
Filed:	May 23, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Paul A. Crotty
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2014	Filing 125 OPINION & ORDER re: 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., Foot Locker, Inc., The Sports Authority, Inc., Famous Horse, Inc. For the reasons set forth above, New Balance's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. N o. 87) is GRANTED. New Balance is to advise the Court by March 10, 2014 whether it voluntarily withdraws its counterclaims, which would moot Denimafia's cross-motion (Dkt. No. 91). (See page 2 n.2 above.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 3/3/2014) (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2014

Filing 125 OPINION & ORDER re: 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., Foot Locker, Inc., The Sports Authority, Inc., Famous Horse, Inc. For the reasons set forth above, New Balance's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. N o. 87) is GRANTED. New Balance is to advise the Court by March 10, 2014 whether it voluntarily withdraws its counterclaims, which would moot Denimafia's cross-motion (Dkt. No. 91). (See page 2 n.2 above.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 3/3/2014) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denimafia Inc.
Represented By:	John Britton Payne
Represented By:	Robert S. Weisbein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?