Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Asics America Corporation v. Akeva L.L.C.
as 19-2249
Not Yet Classified:
ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., PUMA NORTH AMERICA, INC., AKEVA L.L.C. and others
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Mazel Fashions, Inc.
as 2:2018cv03929
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant:
Mazel Fashions, Inc. and Mazel Fashions, Inc. doing business as Ragga Muffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Mazel Fashions, Inc. d/b/a Ragga Muffin
as 1:2018cv03929
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant:
Mazel Fashions, Inc. d/b/a Ragga Muffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Giovanni v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03598
Plaintiff:
Al Giovanni
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., Robert Demartini and Ross Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Giovanni v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. et al
as 4:2017mc03071
Plaintiff:
Al Giovanni
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc., Robert Demartini and Ross Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
ACME IP Holdings LLC v. New Balance Athletics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10174
Plaintiff:
ACME IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
New Balance Athletics, Inc. and New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Horner v. Warrior Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10716
Plaintiff:
Laura Horner
Defendant:
Warrior Sports, Inc. and New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Converse Inc.
as 1:2014cv14715
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant:
Converse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
