Kosowski v. Quartermain et al
| Tim Kosowski |
| Robert Quartermain, Joseph J. Ovsenek, Kenneth McNaughton, John Smith, Ross Mitchell, Tom S.Q. Yip, Silver Standard Resources Inc. and Pretium Resources Inc. |
| 1:2013cv07552 |
| October 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM & OPINION: re: (60 in 1:13-cv-07552-VSB) MOTION to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Robert Allan Quartermain, Pretium Resources Inc., Peter Adrian Johan De Visser, Kenneth C. McNaughton, (84 i n 1:13-cv-07552-VSB) LETTER MOTION for Conference and/or a date for oral argument addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Jeremy A. Lieberman dated May 11, 2017 filed by Pretium Inv. Group. For the foregoing reasons Plaintiffs' Secon d Amended Complaint is DISMISSED and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions, (Docs. 60, 84), and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/13/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-cv-07552-VSB, 1:13-cv-07556-VSB, 1:13-cv-07660-VSB, 1:13-cv-08170-VSB, 1:13-cv-08231-VSB(ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
