Advance Watch Company, Ltd. v. Pennington et al
Advance Watch Company, Ltd. |
Adam Pennington, Neil Martin and Rico Industries, Inc. |
1:2013cv08169 |
November 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Jesse M. Furman |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rico Industries, Inc., Neil Martin, Adam Pennington: For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. In particular, Coun ts Two (the CFAA claim) and Six (the tortious-interference-with-contracts claim) are dismissed in their entirety, and Count Three (the breach-of-contract claim) is dismissed as to Martin. Count Three with respect to Pennington remains, as do Count s One (the Lanham Act claim), Four (the duty-of-loyalty claim, as to which Defendants did not move to dismiss), Five (the misappropriation-of-trade-secrets claim), Seven (the tortious-interference-with-business-relations claim), and Eight (the unfair-competition claim). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 38. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/22/2014) (tn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.