Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Wynne et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv09955
Plaintiff:
Willis Wynne, Jonathan De Crescenzo, Scott Konig and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
NEIDIGE v. CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00391
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ and others
Plaintiff:
GARY EUGENE NEIDIGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. CORIZON, MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
JOHN BELL
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, MARY CHAVEZ, CORIZON, MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLOUD v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, NEIL MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MCCLOUD
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLAND v. MITCHEFF et al
as 2:2016cv00134
Defendant:
MANDIP BARTELS, MAY BENITO-REFUGIO, NEIL MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luick v. Martin
as 1:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Andy Luick
Defendant:
Neil Martin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KENNEY v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2015cv00412
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, GIBSON, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Advance Watch Company, Ltd. v. Pennington et al
as 1:2013cv08169
Plaintiff:
Advance Watch Company, Ltd.
Defendant:
Adam Pennington , Neil Martin and Rico Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
Ronald Neil Martin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McLenithan v. Kitzhaber et al
as 6:2011cv01256
Defendant:
Todd Anderson, Brian Belleque, Rick Corsey and others
Plaintiff:
Gene A. McLenithan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
