MCCLOUD v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
JEFFREY MCCLOUD |
SAMUEL BYRD, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, NEIL MARTIN, MITCHEFF, RAHAM, B. RIGGS and R. ROBINSON |
WVCF (Court Use Only) |
2:2016cv00422 |
October 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 Entry Denying Motion for Medical Injunction - For the foregoing reasons, McCloud's motion for a preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 22 must be denied (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 8/24/2017. (DW) |
Filing 12 ENTRY Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - Corizon Medical Services, Dr. Samuel Byrd, and Nurse R. Riggs are the only defendants remaining in this action. The clerk is directed to update the docket to reflect that all other d efendants are terminated. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants (1) Corizon Medical Services, (2) Dr. Samuel Byrd, and (3) Nurse R. Riggs in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). Pro cess shall consist of the complaint (docket 2), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION). Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/20/2017.(DW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.