Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2026cv01243
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Attorney Thomas Harper, Esq., Attorney Charles Summerall, Esq., Attorney Merrick Benn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moore v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv06635
Defendant:
Morningside Heights Housing Corporations and Does, New York City Police Department Does, Harlem Hospital 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Philip Gibson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 19-30581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL RAHAM SIHGN, Medical Doctor, TODD BARRERE, PREETY SIGHN, Medical Doctor and others
Akram Bilal v. Randee Rewerts
as 19-1681
Petitioner / Appellant:
AKRAM RAHAM BILAL
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Bilal #967707 v. Rewerts
as 1:2019cv00234
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Petitioner:
Akram Raham Bilal #967707
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARCHANT v. NATALIE et al
as 2:2019cv00093
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
VANCE RAHAM, T. AULER, CHARLENE BURKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Gibson v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 17-30284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP GIBSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. LEBLANC, SETH SMITH, ROBERT TANNER and others
MCCLOUD v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2016cv00422
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, NEIL MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MCCLOUD
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. LeBlanc
as 3:2016cv00354
Defendant:
Todd Barrere, Defendant A-Z, Unknown George and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
