Seabrook et al v. Obama et al
Norman Seabrook, The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association and The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association Security Benefits Fund |
Barack Obama, The United States Of America, The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, United States Department of the Treasury, Jacob J. Lew, United States Department of Labor and Thomas E. Perez |
1:2014cv04431 |
June 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Shira A. Scheindlin |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment in Part and for Dismissal. filed by The United States Of America, Barack Obama, Jacob J. Lew, Sylvia Mathews Burwell, United States Department of Labor, United States Departmen t of the Treasury, The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Thomas E. Perez, 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Norman Seabrook, The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association Security Benefits Fund, The Correction Officers' Benevolent Association. For the foregoing reasons, the Government's motion is GRANTED, and COBA's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close Dkt. Nos. 30 & 35, as well as this case. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Order.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/4/2015) (ajs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.