United States Of America v. Narco Freedom, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: Narco Freedom, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv08593
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 383 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Temporary Receiver's motion is granted. The applications of the Former Executives, the Former Employees, and the Landlords are denied without prejudice. The parties may bring their app lications in the bankruptcy court. The Clerk is directed to close Docket Nos. 305, 306, 307, 313, 335, and 350. re: 313 MOTION to Direct -Jason Brand's Motion for an Order Directing the Receiver to pay His Accrued Time filed by Jason Brand, 307 MOTION for Release of Funds filed by Jonathan Brand. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/18/2015) (rjm)
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 299 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court also received a letter dated October 20, 2015, from counsel for Alan Brand. There is nothing in the letter that suggests that the Temporary Receiver should not be authorized to pay up to 8 weeks of vacation pay to former employees. While the letter indicates that the Court would entertain briefing by counsel for Jason Brand and Alan Brand, that briefing was not in opposition to the payment of 8 weeks of vacation pay to other employees, but rather co ncerns specific issues affecting payments to Jason Brand and Alan Brand. No party has advanced a reasoned objection to granting the Temporary Receiver's current application. The accompanying order approving the Temporary Receivers application does not bar any of the interested parties from seeking payment above the 8-week limit. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/21/2015) (kl)
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 142 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons explained above, the Government's motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. A separate order with the terms of the preliminary injunction will follow. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/2/2015) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States Of America v. Narco Freedom, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Represented By: Cristine Irvin Phillips
Represented By: Kirti Vaidya Reddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Narco Freedom, Inc.
Represented By: Linda Jane Clark
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Murphy
Represented By: Karl Jay Sleight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?