Chavis v. United States Of America
Darlene Chavis |
United States Of America |
1:2015cv03504 |
May 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Paul A. Crotty |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDER: granting 77 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. The status conference is ADJOURNED to June 4, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. Telephone Conference set for 6/4/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 5/18/2020) (ama) |
Filing 75 ORDER: A status conference is scheduled for May 19, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. to discuss dates for pretrial submissions and trial. The parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and to follow the necessary prompts. SO ORDERED. ( Telephone Conference set for 5/19/2020 at 04:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman.) (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 5/8/2020) (va) |
Filing 73 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER: A settlement conference is scheduled for Friday, May 8, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review and comply with the Procedures for Cases Referred for Settlement to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, a copy o f which is available on the Court's website at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-sarah-netburn. The parties are strongly encouraged to engage in good-faith settlement negotiations before the settlement conference and preferably before the submissio n to the Court of the Ex Parte Settlement Letters and Acknowledgment Forms, which are to be submitted by Friday, May 1, 2020. Should the parties resolve the litigation before the conference date, they must notify the Court in writing immediately. (Settlement Conference set for 5/8/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 3/16/2020) (ras) |
Filing 72 ORDER: As soon as practicable, the parties are directed to contact Courtroom Deputy Rachel Slusher with both parties on the line, at (212) 805-0286, to schedule a settlement conference for a time when they believe it would be productive. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 3/10/2020) (ras) |
Filing 68 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court by March 13, 2020, indicating whether she has filed her FECA claim with the Secretary of Labor and the result of the determination, or otherwise show cause as to why her complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 2/20/2020) (va) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chavis v. United States Of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Darlene Chavis | |
Represented By: | Amy Buchansky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.