Tyson v. Baltazar et al
| Joel Michael Tyson |
| J. Baltazar and United States Attorney General |
| 1:2015cv08272 |
| October 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Orange |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Paul E. Davison |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 16 Report and Recommendation. The R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to (i) enter judgment a ccordingly, (ii) mail a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to petitioner, and (iii) close this case. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2nd Cir. 2005). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 2/01/2018) (ama) Modified on 2/1/2018 (ama).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
