Romero et al v. Fluff N Fold Laundry Services LLC et al
| Maria Romero and Claudia Gonzalez |
| Fluff N Fold Laundry Services LLC and Min Lin |
| 1:2015cv09535 |
| December 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER: This matter is before me on the parties' joint application to approve their settlement (Proposed Amendment to the Proposed Settlement Agreement ("Proposed Amendment"), annexed as Ex. 1 to the Letter of Colin Mulholland, Esq., to the undersigned, dated May 17, 2018 (Docket Item ("D.I.") 36); Proposed Settlement Agreement, dated Nov. 14, 2016 (D.I. 34) ("Proposed Agreement")). All parties have consented to my exercising plenary juris diction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); as further set forth herein. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, I approve the settlement in this matter. In light of the settlement, the action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/8/2018) (mro)
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION AND ORDER. If the parties submit a renewed application for approval of the settlement, any general release provisions must be fully mutual in all respects. Accordingly, within 30 days of this Order, the parties are to submit a revised settlement agreement that corrects the foregoing deficiencies. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/18/18) Copies transmitted to:All Counsel. (yv)
|
|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. The meaning of the language is as unclear now as it was then; the language does not identify the claims being released in any meaningful way. The parties must clarify what this language is intended to cover. Accordingly, within 30 days of this Order, the parties are to submit a revised settlement agreement that corrects the foregoing deficiency, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/16/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. I cannot approve the settlement at this time. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the parties are to provide the information sought and a revised settlement agreement that eliminates the foregoing issues, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 8/1/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
