Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Romero-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-2655
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMERO-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Telematica Lefic, S.A. De C.V. et al v. Socorro Marin, et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Telemtica Lefic, S.A. De C.V., Dyntra, S.A. De C.V., Rosa Maria Romero Vargas and others
Defendant:
Antonio J. Socorro Marin and Iquantics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nagy et al v. CEP America, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv05648
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Nagy and Maria Romero
Defendant:
CEP America, LLC, MedAmerica Retirement & Benefits Committee and Jane and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Chacha v. Nueva Era Flower Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv03367
Plaintiff:
Carmen Chacha
Defendant:
Nueva Era Flower Corp. and Maria Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chacha v. Nueva Era Flower Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Carmen Chacha
Defendant:
Nueva Era Flower Corp. and Maria Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Chacha v. Nueva Era Flower Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Carmen Chacha
Defendant:
Nueva Era Flower Corp. and Maria Romero
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Consuelo Romero-Arevalo v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1966
Petitioner:
CONSUELO MARIA ROMERO-AREVALO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Romero v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2022cv04575
Plaintiff:
Maria Romero
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Melissa Garcia and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
