Jones v. State of New York et al
| Rafael Arden Jones, Sr. |
| State of New York, New York State Police Department, Bellevue Hospital, Holman, Coleman, Benetez, Millie and Jane Doe Psychiatrist |
| 1:2016cv00556 |
| January 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
ORDER re: 199 Letter, filed by Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.. On January 2, 2020, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff indicating that he was unaware that the Court had issued a decision on his "Request for Review of Judgement." See D kt. No. 199. However, in its November 21, 2019 Order, the Court denied Plaintiff's request, which it interpreted as a motion for reconsideration. See Dkt. No. 197. Chambers will mail a copy of this Order and its November 21, 2019 Order to Plaint iff and note their mailing on the public docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/6/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kv)
|
|
Filing
197
ORDER denying 193 Motion for Reconsideration. On October 28, 2019, the Court received from Plaintiff a "Request for Review of Judgement" that it interprets as a motion for reconsideration of the September 25, 2019 judgment entered in f avor Defendants. Plaintiff's filing is largely directed towards relitigating discovery disputes. The time to revisit these matters has long since passed. Under Local Civil Rule 6.3, "a notice of motion for reconsideration or reargument of a court order determining a motion shall be served within fourteen (14) days after the entry of the Court's determination of the original motion." The deadlines to move for reconsideration of discovery disputes were months ago. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court's September 24, 2019 summary judgment opinion, the deadline to make such a motion was October 9, 2019. However, Plaintiff's filing is dated October 26, 2019. Plaintiff's motion is ther efore DENIED as untimely. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United Sta tes, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and note the mailing on the public docket. This resolves Dkt. No. 193. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/21/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kv)
|
|
Filing
191
OPINION & ORDER re: 172 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Daniel Beretto, Miles Holman, Evan Mele, Michael Holman, Patrick Venetec. For the reasons given above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs is DENIED. This resolves docket items 172 and 183. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case. The Court will mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the prose Plaintiff and a notice of this mailing will be posted on the public docket. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/23/2019) (mro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
