Williams v. The City of New York et al
| Steven Williams |
| The City of New York, NYPD, John Cappelman, John Doe, Jane Doe, Anthony Lujack, Malaga Aragon, David Klahr, Aaron Patterson, Goldberg, Roccisano, BIMS John Doe 1, BIMS John Doe 2, BIMS John Doe 3 and Beth Israel Mount Sinai Health Center |
| 1:2016cv04315 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Unassigned |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND OPINION re: 74 MOTION for Sanctions. filed by Steven Williams. The plaintiff's motion for sanctions is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket Number 74. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/28/17) (yv)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 48 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by The City of New York, John Cappelman. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. As explained above, the Hospital Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the City Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket Numbers 34 and 48. SO ORDERED., (Aaron Patterson, David Klahr and Anthony Lujack terminated.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/14/17) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
