Flores Zabaleta v. Duke et al
| Jefferson Randolfo Flores Zabaleta |
| Elaine Duke, James McCament, Ron Rosenberg and John Thompson |
| 1:2017cv07512 |
| October 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER: The Court granted the defendants' request to file a status report by January 20, 2020, with respect to the plaintiff's application for attorney's fees. Dkt. No. 124. No such report has been submitted. The defendants' time to respond to the motion for attorney's fees is extended to January 31, 2020. The plaintiff's time to reply is extended to February 14, 2020. No further extensions will be granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 1/23/2020) ( Responses due by 1/31/2020, Replies due by 2/14/2020.)(ks)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER: The Parties are directed to provide the Court with a status update and whether the Government requests a sixth extension of time to file its reply to the plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/22/2019) (ks)
|
|
Filing
93
AMENDED OPINION & ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Elaine Duke, Ron Rosenberg, John Thompson, James McCament, 66 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Jefferson Randolfo Flores Zabaleta, 70 MOTION to File Amicus Brief (Corrected Version of Dkt. No. 68). filed by Kevin Johnson, Michael J. Wishnie, Talia Peleg, Elora Mukherjee, Alina Das, Sameer Ashar, Sarah Paoletti, Nancy Morawetz, Laila Hlass, Peter L. Markowitz, Anj u Gupta, Lindsay Nash, Ramzi Kassem, Amna Akbar, Anil Kalhan. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the reasons explained above , the defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 57, 66, and 70. The plaintiff is directed to submit a proposed judgment and a supporting brief by March 22, 2019. The defendants may respond by March 29, 2019. SO ORDERED., (Brief due by 3/22/2019., Responses to Brief due by 3/29/2019) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/20/19) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
