Cases 1 - 10 of 744
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09594
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Doe v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2024cv07467
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, John Thompson and Alejandro Mayorkas
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ziegler, et al. v. Washington State Correctional Industries, et al.
as 24-5389
Defendant:
BOBBI JO NEUMEIER, SCOTT LIGHT, P.A.C., THOMAS L'HEUREUX, MHO and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN L. HEGGE and JEFFREY SCOTT ZIEGLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Thompson v. A Mayan, LLC
as 1:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
A Mayan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SAHIN v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) et al
as 2:2024cv08225
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, DIRECTOR OF USCIS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS), JOHN THOMPSON, DIRECTOR OF THE NEWARK DISTRICT OFFICE OF USCIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAHCIHAN SAHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
