Zappin v. Comfort et al
| Anthony Zappin |
| Claire Comfort, Robert Wallack, The Wallack Firm, P.C., Harriet Newman Cohen, Cohen Rabin Stine Schumann LLP and Comprehensive Family Services, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv01693 |
| February 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
197
OPINION AND ORDER re: 190 MOTION for Reconsideration of the Court's September 30, 2022 Order filed by Anthony Zappin, 192 MOTION to Vacate the Court's September 30, 2022 Pre-Filing Injunction filed by Anth ony Zappin. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and motion to vacate are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at ECF Nos. 190 and 192. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 9/11/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing
196
ORDER granting 195 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/31/2023) (tg)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration at ECF No. 190 and (2) Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Court's September 20, 2022 Pre-Filing Injunction at ECF No.192.Although the Court is in receipt o f Plaintiff's memorandum of law in support of the motion for reconsideration at ECF No. 191, Plaintiff's memorandum of law in support of the motion at ECF No. 192 has not been filed on the docket. Plaintiff is directed to file his memorandum of law by August 31, 2023. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 8/28/2023) (ate)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER denying without prejudice 141 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 141 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying without prejudice 143 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 146 Motion to Dismiss. In light of Plai ntiffs third amended complaint, the Court denies Defendants motions to dismiss without prejudice. (ECF Nos. 141, 143, 146). Any new motions to dismiss shall be filed by November 16, 2020. Plaintiff must file any opposition by January 7, 2021, and replies, if any,shall be filed by January 15, 2021. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/26/2020) (js)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Parties are to brief Defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to the following schedule: Defendants' motions are due by February 7, 2020; Plaintiff's opposition is due by March 27, 2020; Defendants' replies are due by April 10, 2020, and as further set forth in this order. (Motions due by 2/7/2020. Responses due by 3/27/2020. Replies due by 4/10/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 1/8/2020) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
92
OPINION re: 61 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel; 48 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer: For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's motion to unseal and Plaintiff's motion for disqualification are denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 1/30/2019) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
