Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Anthony Zappin v. Carey, Douglas, Kessler, & Ruby, PLLC
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY ZAPPIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CAREY, DOUGLAS, KESSLER, & RUBY, PLLC and S. BENJAMIN BRYANT
Anthony Zappin v. Ancil Ramey
as 23-1767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY ZAPPIN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANCIL GLENN RAMEY, STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC, KEVIN M. DOYLE and others
Zappin v. Schorr
as 23-671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew F. Cooper, Kevin M. Doyle and David Evan Schorr
Defendant:
Michael Berg and Letitia A. James, Esq.
Zappin v. Cooper
as 23-165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew F. Cooper and Lauren Liebhauser
Defendant:
Kevin M. Doyle, Hannah Yu and Jane Doe
Zappin v. Carey Douglas Kessler & Ruby PLLC et al
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant:
Carey Douglas Kessler & Ruby PLLC and S. Benjamin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Zappin v. Ramey et al
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant:
Ancil G. Ramey, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, Kevin M. Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Zappin v. Rachael Fletcher Cipoletti
as 22-1065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN ZAPPIN and ANTHONY ZAPPIN
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHAEL L. FLETCHER CIPOLETTI, JUSTICE EVAN JENKINS, JUSTICE BETH WALKER and others
Zappin v. Supple
as 21-2873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Zappin
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Richard Supple, Jr. and Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Zappin v. Cipoletti et al
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Justice Bill Wooton, Justice John Hutchinson, Anne Lambright and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
