Zappin v. Schorr et al
| Anthony Zappin |
| David Evan Schorr, Matthew F. Cooper and Kevin M. Doyle |
| 1:2022cv02034 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Fraud |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: granting #16 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Due to Lack of Service of Process. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Michael A. Berg dated 5/5/22. The request for an adjournment is Granted. The briefing schedule for the motion to dismiss is adjourned until the defendants are served. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/05/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 16
LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Due to Lack of Service of Process addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Michael A. Berg dated 5/5/22. Document filed by Matthew F. Cooper, Kevin M. Doyle..(Berg, Michael)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' letters relating to the defendants' request that this action be dismissed. See Docs. 10, 12. The parties are instructed to brief the motion, pursuant to the following schedule: Motion to Dismiss: May 13, 2022. Opposition: June 3, 2022. Reply: June 10, 2022. It is SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 5/13/2022., Responses due by 6/3/2022, Replies due by 6/10/2022.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/29/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing 14
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #13 MOTION for Recusal of Judge Edgardo Ramos. . Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Recusal of Judge Edgardo Ramos. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 12
LETTER addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Anthony Zappin dated April 20, 2022 re: Plaintiff's Response to New York State Assistant Attorney General Michael Berg's Abusive, Frivolous and Meritless Request for Dismissal of This Action without Abiding by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Without Affording Plaintiff a Full and Fail Opportunity to Litigate the Merits of His Claims. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #10 Letter filed by Kevin M. Doyle, Matthew F. Cooper. ENDORSEMENT: Mr. Zappin is directed to respond in no more than three pages by Wednesday, April 20, 2022. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/14/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing 10
LETTER addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Michael A. Berg dated 4/12/22 re: Review of the Complaint. Document filed by Matthew F. Cooper, Kevin M. Doyle..(Berg, Michael)
|
|
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Judge Jed S. Rakoff is no longer assigned to the case. (aea)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Kevin M. Doyle. (vf)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to David Evan Schorr. (vf)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Matthew F. Cooper. (vf)
|
|
Filing 6
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to KEVIN M. DOYLE, re: #2 Complaint. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 5
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to DAVID EVAN SCHORR, re: #2 Complaint. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 4
REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to MATTHEW F. COOPER, re: #2 Complaint. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against Matthew F. Cooper, Kevin M. Doyle, David Evan Schorr. Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Anthony Jacob Zappin to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (gp)
|
|
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Anthony Jacob Zappin. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (gp)
|
|
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp)
|
|
Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp)
|
|
Case Designated ECF. (gp)
|
|
Filing 1
FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25848993)Document filed by Anthony Zappin..(Zappin, Anthony) Modified on 3/14/2022 (gp).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
