Budovsky v. United States of America
Petitioner: Arthur Budovsky
Respondent: United States Of America
Case Number: 1:2018cv07514
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: NewYork
Presiding Judge: Denise L Cote
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2018 Filing 6 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion under Section 2255 addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote from AUSA Christine Magdo dated September 21, 2018. Document filed by United States Of America.(Magdo, Christine)
August 29, 2018 Mailed a copy of #5 Order to Answer, to Attn: Criminal Division at US Attorney's Office SDNY One Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007. (aea)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2255: The Clerk of Court shall notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this order has been issued. Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the motion. Movant shall have thirty days from the date on which Movant is served with Respondent's answer to file a response. Absent further order, the motion will be considered fully submitted as of that date. All further papers filed or submitted for filing must include the criminal docket number and will be docketed in the criminal case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/28/2018) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
August 17, 2018 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of Arthur Budovsky's Motion to Vacate his Conviction and Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 2255 re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by Arthur Budovsky. (jgo) (jgo).
August 17, 2018 Filing 3 DECLARATION of Arthur Budovsky's in Support re: #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). Document filed by Arthur Budovsky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(jgo)
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (jgo)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 18cr368.Document filed by Arthur Budovsky.(pc)
August 17, 2018 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms.php. (pc)
August 17, 2018 Case Designated ECF. (pc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Budovsky v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Arthur Budovsky
Represented By: Marshall Aron Mintz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Represented By: Christine Ingrid Magdo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?