Perez v. Bryant et al
| Felipe Perez |
| Islamic Chaplain, Palmer, John Doe #1, Dee, Ms. Simpson, Mayshack, E. Bryant, John Doe #3 and John Doe #2 |
| 1:2020cv00079 |
| January 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #3 Order of Dismissal, #4 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), Notice of Appeal Forms, to Felipe Perez DIN No. 17A5251 Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562-5442..(vba) |
Filing 4
CIVIL JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis and prisoner authorization or pay the $400.00 in relevant fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/24/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court dismisses the complaint without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 2/24/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION & PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 2/7/2020. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 2/7/2020. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 2/7/2020. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 1/8/2020) (Attachments: #1 Supplement IFP, #2 Supplement Prisoner Authorization)(scn) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Colleen McMahon. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
| Mailed a copy of #2 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application & Prisoner Authorization, to Felipe Perez DIN No. 17A5251 Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562-5442. (vba) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. Bryant, Dee, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, Islamic Chaplain, Mayshack, Palmer, Simpson. Document filed by Felipe Perez. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
